What was the ruling in U.S. vs. Nixon regarding evidence?

The ruling in U.S. vs. Nixon established a significant precedent regarding the limits of presidential power, particularly in relation to the withholding of evidence. In this landmark case, the Supreme Court held that the President does not have an absolute right to withhold information required for a judicial inquiry. This decision was pivotal as it affirmed the principle that no one, including the President, is above the law, and thus the President must comply with lawful subpoenas for evidence.

The ruling indicated that the President's need for confidentiality in his communications was not absolute and could be overridden in the interest of justice. This determination underscored the judiciary's role in checking executive power and maintaining accountability. Ultimately, the Court concluded that the President had to provide the requested evidence, which significantly impacted the Watergate scandal proceedings by facilitating the disclosure of tape recordings crucial to the case.