What did the Supreme Court rule in Regents of the University of California vs. Bakke?

In the case of Regents of the University of California vs. Bakke, the Supreme Court ruled that while affirmative action programs are permissible, they cannot involve racial quotas. The Court's decision upheld the principle that race can be one of several factors considered in college admissions. This landmark ruling recognized the importance of diversity and the educational benefits that arise from a diverse student body.

The ruling emphasized that affirmative action can play a role in promoting equality and combating systemic discrimination, allowing institutions to take race into account to enhance diversity. However, the Court also made it clear that admissions systems must be individualized and not rely solely on strict numerical quotas or set-asides based solely on race. This nuanced position acknowledges the complexities of fostering diversity while balancing equal treatment principles.